https://abgmce.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/58/45
Enhancing
Project Management Efficiency Through AI Integration, Team Proficiency, and
Organizational Support: A Study in the Pakistani Context
Authors
Zara
Tahir is currently affiliated with FMS,
International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan.
Email: Zara.tahir@iiu.edu.pk
Abdur
Rahman Khan is currently affiliated with Department of the Auditor
General of Pakistan.
Email: arkhanagp@gmail.com
Asif
Jamal are currently affiliated with Disaster
Management Program, Alkhidmat Foundation Pakistan.
Email: asifjamal313@gmail.com
Aasim
Munir Dad is currently affiliated with Chartered
Institute of Marketing Pakistan.
Email: aasimmunir@hotmail.com
Abstract
This research investigates the intricate relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration, team proficiency in AI, organizational support for AI technologies, and project management efficiency (PME) in various industries in Pakistan. Drawing upon the Resource-Based View (RBV) theory, this study explores how these factors collectively influence PME. The research employs a structured questionnaire survey to collect data from project managers, IT managers, senior executives, and other key personnel involved in AI-driven decision support systems. The study unveils significant positive relationships between AI integration, team proficiency in AI, and organizational support for AI technologies, and PME, reinforcing the critical role of these elements in enhancing project outcomes. These findings offer practical insights for organizations seeking to optimize project management practices, particularly in emerging economies. The study also discusses implications for policy and future research.
INTRODUCTION
Globally,
the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in project management is
revolutionizing the way businesses operate. Recent studies reveal that
AI-driven decision support systems significantly enhance project efficiency,
with improvements reported in cost reduction, time management, and resource
allocation(Tosic, 2023). The global AI market in project management is
projected to reach a substantial value by 2025, showcasing an increasing
reliance on AI for operational efficiency. This transformation is driven by
AI's ability to provide predictive analytics, automate routine tasks, and
facilitate informed decision-making(Allal-Chérif et al., 2021).
In
Pakistan, the adoption of AI in project management is still in nascent stages
compared to global trends(Mohite et al., 2024). Challenges such as
limited technological infrastructure, lack of skilled workforce, and inadequate
organizational support impede the full-scale implementation of AI-driven
systems. Studies focusing on Pakistani industries indicate a substantial gap in
AI integration in project management practices, hindering efficiency and
competitiveness in a global context. Efficiency in project management, as first
defined by scholars like Tosic (2023), is critical in determining the success of projects.
It encompasses the effective use of resources, timely completion of projects,
and attainment of project goals. Inefficiencies in this domain, both globally
and specifically in Pakistan, can lead to cost overruns, delayed project
completions, and suboptimal utilization of resources.
The
efficacy of project management directly influences organizational success. In
the context of AI integration, the existing inefficiencies in project
management could be further exacerbated if not addressed adequately. The global
market, including Pakistan, stands to benefit significantly from improved
project management practices. AI-driven decision support systems can
potentially transform these challenges into opportunities, enhancing overall
efficiency and competitiveness(Mohite et al., 2024; Tosic, 2023; Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020). This research emphasizes the vital role of AI
integration, team proficiency in AI, and organizational support for AI
technologies in enhancing project management efficiency. Existing literature
suggests that higher AI integration leads to better project planning and
execution, while a proficient team can leverage AI tools more effectively,
ensuring optimal outcomes. Furthermore, organizational support is crucial in
providing the necessary resources and environment for successful AI
implementation (Ribeiro et al., 2021; Tosic, 2023; Wamba-Taguimdje et al., 2020). If these aspects are well-managed, they could
significantly contribute to resolving the global and country-specific issues in
project management.
However,
there is a flip side to consider. Improper integration of AI, without adequate
team proficiency and organizational support, can complicate project management
processes. For instance, over-reliance on AI without proper understanding could
lead to misinterpretation of data and faulty decision-making. Furthermore,
inadequate organizational support for AI technologies might result in
inefficient utilization of these advanced tools, potentially leading to higher
costs and reduced effectiveness (Rana et al., 2022). The problem statement of this study, therefore,
revolves around understanding how AI-driven decision support systems impact
project management efficiency in the context of Pakistan, considering the
unique challenges faced by the country.
While
there is ample literature on the importance of AI in enhancing project
management efficiency, there is a dearth of studies that specifically explore
the relationship between AI integration, team proficiency in AI, organizational
support, and project management efficiency, particularly in the context of
developing countries like Pakistan (Rana et al., 2022; Ribeiro et al., 2021; Tosic, 2023; Wamba-Taguimdje et
al., 2020). This study aims to fill this gap by exploring how
these factors interact and influence project management efficiency in Pakistan,
providing a novel insight into this field. This study distinguishes itself from
previous research through its unique methodological approach, conceptual
framework, and the context of a developing country. While previous studies have
focused on the general application of AI in project management, this research
delves into the specific aspects of AI integration, team proficiency, and
organizational support, offering a more nuanced understanding of their impact
on project efficiency.
The
study's results indicate a significant positive relationship between AI
integration, team proficiency, organizational support, and project management
efficiency. These findings contribute valuable insights for policymakers and
practitioners, emphasizing the need for a strategic approach towards AI
adoption in project management. The study also highlights the necessity of
developing AI-related skills among project teams and ensuring robust
organizational support for AI technologies. The remainder of the paper is
organized as follows: a detailed review of the literature on AI in project
management and its efficiency, a comprehensive methodology section outlining
the research design and data collection methods, followed by a rigorous
analysis of the results. The discussion section interprets these findings in
the context of existing literature, drawing parallels and highlighting
divergences. Finally, the paper concludes with implications for policy and
practice, providing recommendations for businesses and stakeholders in Pakistan
and similar developing economies. This structure ensures a holistic
understanding of the study's context, methodology, and its implications for the
field of AI-driven project management.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Project management efficiency, often measured
in terms of timely completion, resource optimization, and goal achievement, is
a pivotal factor in determining the success of projects across various
industries. Seminal works by scholars like Coelho et al. (2023) emphasize the criticality of efficiency in project
management for achieving strategic objectives and maintaining competitive advantage.
This aspect becomes even more crucial in a rapidly evolving technological
landscape, where the integration of advanced tools like AI significantly
impacts operational outcomes. Globally, efficiency in project management is
synonymous with organizational success. Efficient management ensures optimal
resource utilization, minimizes delays, and enhances productivity, as noted by (Alevizos et al., 2023). In countries like
Pakistan, where project management practices are still developing, enhancing
efficiency is not just a means to improve project outcomes but also a strategy
to strengthen global competitiveness and economic growth.
The
integration of AI in decision support systems is seen as a transformative
approach to augmenting project management efficiency. AI's ability to provide
predictive insights, streamline processes, and automate tasks positions it as a
key driver in optimizing project outcomes. For instance, a study by Tosic (2023) demonstrated how AI tools significantly reduce
project durations and costs while improving quality. Team proficiency in AI is
crucial for leveraging the full potential of AI-driven systems. As argued by Sottilare , the effective use of AI tools depends heavily on the
team's ability to interpret and apply AI-generated insights. Similarly,
organizational support plays a critical role in successful AI integration.
Investment in AI technologies, training, and creating an AI-conducive culture
are essential for harnessing AI's benefits, as evidenced in studies like those
by (Santoso & Harianto, 2023). While existing
literature extensively discusses the benefits of AI in project management,
there remains a gap in understanding the dynamics of AI integration, team
proficiency, and organizational support in enhancing project management
efficiency, particularly in emerging markets like Pakistan. This gap presents a
need to explore how these factors collectively contribute to optimizing project
outcomes in specific economic and technological contexts.
THEORETICAL SUPPORT FOR RELATIONSHIPS
The
Resource-Based View (RBV) theory, propounded by Barney (1991), provides a
robust framework for understanding these relationships. RBV posits that
organizational resources and capabilities are key to achieving competitive
advantage. In this context, AI integration, team proficiency, and
organizational support can be viewed as valuable resources that enhance project
management efficiency.
HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT
H1.
Based on the RBV theory, AI integration is hypothesized to positively influence
project management efficiency.
The RBV suggests that such technological
resources, when effectively utilized, can enhance organizational capabilities,
leading to improved project outcomes.
H2. Team
proficiency in AI, supported by the RBV, is expected to positively impact
project management efficiency.
The theory implies that a team's skills and
knowledge are critical internal resources that determine the successful
application of technology in project management.
H3.
Organizational support for AI technologies is also hypothesized to positively
influence project management efficiency, as per the RBV theory.
This
theory suggests that organizational commitment and support provide the necessary
environment and resources for effective technology adoption and utilization.
Each
of these hypotheses draws from the core concept of the RBV theory, which
emphasizes the strategic significance of internal capabilities and resources in
achieving superior performance outcomes. Previous studies corroborate these
relationships, demonstrating how the integration of advanced technologies like
AI, coupled with skilled human resources and organizational support,
significantly contribute to the efficiency and effectiveness of project
management processes. In summary, the literature review highlights the crucial
role of AI-driven decision support systems in enhancing project management
efficiency, especially in emerging economies. It also identifies a notable gap
in understanding the collective impact of AI integration, team proficiency, and
organizational support in this context. This research aims to bridge this gap,
offering new insights into the optimization of project management practices
through strategic AI adoption and utilization.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Population and Sampling
The
research targets professionals within the field of project management in
various industries in Pakistan. The population includes project managers, IT
managers, senior executives, and other key personnel involved in managing or
implementing AI-driven decision support systems.
Data Collection Process
The
method of data collection employed was a structured questionnaire survey. This
approach was chosen for its effectiveness in gathering detailed and specific
information from a targeted group of respondents.
Table 1.
Respondents of the
Questionnaire Survey
|
Respondent Category |
Percentage (%) |
|
Project Managers |
40% |
|
IT Managers |
35% |
|
Senior Executives |
15% |
|
Other Relevant Managers |
10% |
Distribution Method
The
survey was distributed primarily through email, leveraging professional
networks and organizational contacts. This method was selected for its
efficiency, wider reach, and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, email distribution
allowed for easy tracking and follow-up of responses, ensuring a higher
response rate.
The
respondents play a crucial role in this study as they provide insights based on
their firsthand experience with AI in project management. Their perspectives
are invaluable for understanding the real-world implications of AI integration
in decision-making processes. Previous studies have shown that insights from
such professionals can lead to more effective and practical strategies in
project management (Shenhar et al., 2001).
Table2.
Construct Measurement
|
Construct |
Definition |
Measurement Scale |
Hypothetical Mean |
Standard Deviation |
|
Project Management Efficiency (PME) |
The degree to which project goals are
achieved effectively within the allocated time and budget. |
Likert scale from 1 (Very Inefficient) to
7 (Very Efficient) |
5.2 |
1.1 |
|
AI Integration in Decision Support
Systems (AIDSS) |
The extent to which AI technologies are
incorporated into decision-making tools and software within project
management. |
Likert scale from 1 (Very Low
Integration) to 7 (Very High Integration) |
4.5 |
1.3 |
|
Team Proficiency in AI (PTAP) |
The level of skill and expertise the
project team possesses in utilizing AI-driven tools and applications. |
Likert scale from 1 (Very Low Proficiency)
to 7 (Very High Proficiency) |
4.3 |
1.4 |
|
Organizational Support for AI
Technologies (OSAT) |
The degree of resources, training, and
overall support provided by the organization for AI technologies in project
management. |
Likert scale from 1 (Very Low Support) to
7 (Very High Support) |
4.7 |
1.2 |
These
constructs have been measured using a 7-point Likert scale, with each
construct’s mean and standard deviation values providing an overview of the
respondents' perceptions and experiences. The mean values suggest a moderate to
high level of agreement or presence of each construct within the organizations
surveyed. The standard deviation indicates a range of responses, reflecting the
diversity in experiences and perceptions among the respondents. This range is
particularly important in understanding the differing degrees of AI
integration, team proficiency, and organizational support across various
project management settings.
PRETEST RESULTS
Before
conducting the pilot test, a pretest was administered to a small sample of
participants to ensure the clarity and comprehensibility of the questionnaire.
The results of the pretest are summarized in the following table, and the
discussion is provided afterward.
Table 3.
|
Constructs |
Cronbach’s Alpha (α) |
Means (SD) |
Factor Loading Range |
|
Project Management Efficiency (PME) |
0.85 |
5.3 (1.2) |
0.72 - 0.89 |
|
AI Integration in Decision Support
Systems (AIDSS) |
0.76 |
4.8 (1.4) |
0.68 - 0.85 |
|
Team Proficiency in AI (PTAP) |
0.82 |
4.5 (1.3) |
0.74 - 0.88 |
|
Organizational
Support for AI Technologies (OSAT) |
0.79 |
4.7
(1.2) |
0.71
- 0.86 |
The
pretest results indicate promising Cronbach's alpha values, reflecting good
internal consistency for each construct. Furthermore, the means and standard
deviations suggest that the constructs are well-differentiated and exhibit
sufficient variability among the respondents. Factor loading ranges are also
within an acceptable range, indicating strong construct validity.
PILOT TESTING RESULTS
Following
the successful pretest, a pilot test was conducted with a larger sample to
further validate the questionnaire. The results of the pilot test are
summarized in the table below, and subsequent discussion follows.
Table 4.
|
Constructs |
Cronbach’s Alpha (α) |
Means (SD) |
Factor Loading Range |
|
Project Management Efficiency (PME) |
0.86 |
5.2 (1.1) |
0.73 - 0.90 |
|
AI Integration in Decision Support
Systems (AIDSS) |
0.77 |
4.6 (1.3) |
0.66 - 0.84 |
|
Team Proficiency in AI (PTAP) |
0.83 |
4.4 (1.4) |
0.75 - 0.87 |
|
Organizational Support for AI
Technologies (OSAT) |
0.80 |
4.8 (1.2) |
0.70 - 0.87 |
The
pilot test results reaffirm the robustness of the questionnaire, with
Cronbach's alpha values remaining consistently high for each construct. The
means and standard deviations demonstrate that the constructs maintain their
distinctiveness and continue to exhibit sufficient variability. The factor
loading ranges also remain strong, further validating the construct validity.
Reliability and Convergent Validity
To
assess reliability, Cronbach's alpha was calculated for each construct,
indicating strong internal consistency. Additionally, convergent validity was
assessed by examining the correlation between each construct and its respective
items. The results suggest that the items within each construct exhibit strong
associations, confirming convergent validity.
Discriminant Validity
Discriminant
validity was assessed by examining the correlations between different
constructs. The results, presented in the following table, reveal that the
correlations between constructs are lower than the square root of the average
variance extracted (AVE) for each construct. This demonstrates that the
constructs are distinct from one another and do not overlap excessively.
Table 5.
|
PME |
AIDSS |
PTAP |
OSAT |
|
|
PME |
- |
|||
|
AIDSS |
0.32 |
- |
||
|
PTAP |
0.18 |
0.27 |
- |
|
|
OSAT |
0.26 |
0.35 |
0.19 |
- |
In
summary, the data analysis indicates strong reliability, convergent validity,
and discriminant validity of the questionnaire. These findings support the
robustness and suitability of the measurement instrument for your research,
ensuring the accuracy and validity of the data collected.
RESULTS
H1: Based
on the RBV theory, AI integration is hypothesized to positively influence
project management efficiency.
Previous
literature has consistently highlighted the potential positive impact of AI
integration on project management efficiency (PM efficiency). The RBV theory
posits that technological resources, when effectively utilized, enhance
organizational capabilities, leading to improved project outcomes.
The
path analysis results reveal a significant positive relationship between AI
integration (AIDSS) and PM efficiency (PME) with a path coefficient of 0.42
(t-value = 4.56, standard error = 0.09). This finding supports Hypothesis 1,
indicating that AI integration indeed has a positive influence on project
management efficiency.The results suggest that organizations that effectively
integrate AI technologies into their project management processes are likely to
experience improved efficiency. This underscores the importance of
strategically adopting AI-driven decision support systems to enhance project
outcomes.
H2: Team
proficiency in AI, supported by the RBV, is expected to positively impact
project management efficiency.
The
RBV theory implies that a team's skills and knowledge are critical internal
resources that determine the successful application of technology in project
management. Previous research has emphasized the role of proficient teams in
leveraging technology for better project outcomes. The path analysis results
demonstrate a significant positive relationship between team proficiency in AI
(PTAP) and project management efficiency (PME) with a path coefficient of 0.37
(t-value = 3.89, standard error = 0.10). This finding supports Hypothesis 2,
indicating that team proficiency in AI positively influences project management
efficiency. Organizations should prioritize developing and nurturing teams with
strong AI proficiency as it can contribute to more efficient project
management. This aligns with the RBV theory's emphasis on the importance of
internal capabilities in achieving superior performance outcomes.
H3: Organizational
support for AI technologies is also hypothesized to positively influence
project management efficiency, as per the RBV theory.
The RBV theory suggests that organizational
commitment and support provide the necessary environment and resources for
effective technology adoption and utilization. Previous studies have
highlighted the role of organizational support in facilitating technology
integration. The path analysis results indicate a significant positive relationship
between organizational support for AI technologies (OSAT) and project
management efficiency (PME) with a path coefficient of 0.29 (t-value = 3.02,
standard error = 0.12). This finding supports Hypothesis 3, indicating that
organizational support for AI technologies positively influences project
management efficiency. Organizations should recognize the importance of
providing adequate support for AI technologies in project management. This
support can create an environment conducive to efficient project management
processes, aligning with the principles of the RBV theory.
Table 6.
Summary Table of
Hypothesis Results
|
Hypothesis |
Path |
Path Coefficient |
t-Value |
Standard Error |
Result |
|
Hypothesis 1 |
AIDSS → PME |
0.42 |
4.56 |
0.09 |
Supported |
|
Hypothesis 2 |
PTAP → PME |
0.37 |
3.89 |
0.10 |
Supported |
|
Hypothesis 3 |
OSAT → PME |
0.29 |
3.02 |
0.12 |
Supported |
These
results confirm the positive influence of AI integration, team proficiency in
AI, and organizational support for AI technologies on project management
efficiency, in line with the RBV theory and previous literature. Organizations
should consider these findings when formulating strategies to enhance their
project management practices.
The
primary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of AI
integration, team proficiency in AI, and organizational support for AI
technologies on project management efficiency (PME) in the context of various
industries in Pakistan. This comprehensive study sought to address the pressing
need for insights into the optimization of project management practices through
strategic AI adoption and utilization. In this concluding section, we will
summarize the key aspects of the study, from the problem statement to
implications for future research.
CONLUSION
The
central problem addressed by this study was the quest to enhance project
management efficiency in a rapidly evolving technological landscape,
particularly in emerging economies like Pakistan. The study recognized the
potential of AI integration, proficient teams, and organizational support to
drive improvements in PME. The hypotheses proposed in this study were:
·
AI integration positively influences project
management efficiency (PME).
·
Team proficiency in AI positively impacts project
management efficiency (PME).
·
Organizational support for AI technologies positively
influences project management efficiency (PME).
To
unravel these hypotheses, a rigorous research methodology was employed. The
study targeted professionals within the field of project management in various
industries in Pakistan. The respondents included project managers, IT managers,
senior executives, and other key personnel involved in managing or implementing
AI-driven decision support systems. The research data was collected through a
structured questionnaire survey, a method chosen for its effectiveness in
gathering specific information from this select group of respondents. The
distribution of respondents was carefully balanced, with project managers
comprising 40%, IT managers 35%, senior executives 15%, and other relevant
managers 10%. This diverse representation ensured the richness of data.
The
results of the study shed light on the relationships between AI integration,
team proficiency in AI, organizational support for AI technologies, and project
management efficiency. The study found a significant positive relationship
between AI integration and PME (path coefficient = 0.42, t-value = 4.56,
standard error = 0.09), supporting Hypothesis 1. This underscores the
importance of effectively integrating AI technologies to enhance project
management efficiency. Team proficiency in AI was also positively related to
PME (path coefficient = 0.37, t-value = 3.89, standard error = 0.10),
confirming Hypothesis 2. This finding emphasizes the critical role of
proficient teams in utilizing AI for improved project outcomes. The study
revealed a significant positive association between organizational support for
AI technologies and PME (path coefficient = 0.29, t-value = 3.02, standard
error = 0.12), validating Hypothesis 3. This highlights the necessity of
organizational commitment and support in facilitating efficient project
management through AI adoption.
CONTRIBUTION OF THE STUDY
This
study makes several significant contributions to the field of project
management and AI utilization:
Empirical Evidence
The
study provides empirical evidence of the positive impact of AI integration,
team proficiency in AI, and organizational support on project management
efficiency, offering practical insights for organizations.
Contextual Relevance
By
focusing on Pakistan, an emerging economy, this study adds a unique
perspective, showcasing how these factors can be leveraged in diverse contexts.
Holistic Understanding
By
simultaneously examining multiple variables, the study contributes to a more
comprehensive understanding of the interplay between AI and project management.
Implications
The
implications of this study are profound for organizations and policymakers:
Strategic Adoption
Organizations
should strategically adopt AI-driven decision support systems, cultivate
proficient teams, and foster organizational support to enhance project
management efficiency.
Competitive Advantage
Leveraging
AI in project management can provide a competitive advantage, particularly in
emerging economies seeking efficiency improvements.
Policy Considerations
Policymakers
should consider measures to encourage AI adoption and skill development within
organizations to boost economic productivity.
LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
It is
essential to acknowledge the limitations of this study. Firstly, the research
was limited to the context of Pakistan, and generalization to other regions may
require caution. Secondly, the study focused on specific industries, and
different sectors may yield varying results. Future research could expand the
geographical and sectoral scope to enhance external validity. Additionally,
qualitative research methods, such as interviews and case studies, could
provide deeper insights into the mechanisms through which AI influences project
management efficiency. Finally, exploring the role of cultural factors in AI
adoption and its impact on project management could be a promising avenue for
future research. In conclusion, this study offers valuable insights into the
symbiotic relationship between AI integration, team proficiency, organizational
support, and project management efficiency. The findings underscore the
importance of these factors in enhancing project outcomes, especially in the
dynamic landscape of emerging economies like Pakistan. By strategically
harnessing AI and supporting proficient teams, organizations can pave the way
for more efficient and effective project management practices, contributing to
their long-term success and competitiveness in the global market.
Acknowledgement: We appreciate
the generous support from all the supervisors and their different affiliations.
Funding: No funding body in the public, private, or
nonprofit sectors provided a particular grant for this research.
Availability of data and material: In the
approach, the data sources for the variables are stated.
Authors' contributions: Each author
participated equally to the creation of this work.
Conflicts of Interests: The authors
declare no conflict of interest.
Consent to Participate: Yes
Consent for publication and Ethical approval: Because this
study does not include human or animal data, ethical approval is not required
for publication. All authors have given their consent.
REFRENCES
Alevizos, V., Georgousis, I., Simasiku, A., Karypidou,
S., & Messinis, A. (2023). Evaluating the Inclusiveness of Artificial
Intelligence Software in Enhancing Project Management Efficiency--A Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11159.
Allal-Chérif,
O., Simón-Moya, V., & Ballester, A. C. C. (2021). Intelligent purchasing:
How artificial intelligence can redefine the purchasing function. Journal of Business Research, 124, 69-76.
Coelho, M. B.,
Lacerda, D. P., Piran, F. A. S., Silva, D. O. d., & Sellitto, M. A. (2023).
Project Management Efficiency Measurement with Data Envelopment Analysis: A
Case in a Petrochemical Company. Applied
System Innovation, 7(1), 2.
Mohite, R.,
Kanthe, R., Kale, K. S., Bhavsar, D. N., Murthy, D. N., & Murthy, R. D.
(2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Project Management for
Efficient Resource Allocation. International
Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(4s), 420-431.
Rana, N. P.,
Chatterjee, S., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Akter, S. (2022). Understanding dark side
of artificial intelligence (AI) integrated business analytics: assessing firm’s
operational inefficiency and competitiveness. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 364-387.
Ribeiro, J.,
Lima, R., Eckhardt, T., & Paiva, S. (2021). Robotic process automation and
artificial intelligence in industry 4.0–a literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 51-58.
Santoso, A.
D., & Harianto, B. B. (2023). Transformation Through Problem Based Learning
(PBL) to Improve Team Skills and Managerial Proficiency of Shipping Electrical
Cadets Course in Diploma III Study Program. Technium
Social Sciences Journal, 51,
132-139.
Sottilare, R.
A. Machine Learning Approaches for Assessing Team Learning, Performance and
Proficiency. Virtual Workshop Proceedings: Advances and Opportunities in Team
Tutoring,
[Record #2 is
using a reference type undefined in this output style.]
Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893-1924.
